Cited by 240Linguistics and Education ResearchEducational Theory and Curriculum StudiesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Discourse, Learning, and Teaching

Hicks, Deborah·1995·Review of Research in Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1167279

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subject areas can be viewed as spaces in which knowledge is produced or constructed, rather than as repositories of content knowledge or information.

    “A number of theorists have argued that the subject areas can be viewed as spaces in which knowledge is produced or constructed, rather than as repositories of content knowledge or information (Foucault, 1972;Halliday & Martin, 1993;Hicks, 1995;Lemke, 1990;Luke, 2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hicks, D.
Corresponding author
Hicks, Deborah
Venue
Review of Research in Education
Published
1995
Volume
21
Pages
49
ISSN
0091-732X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003303856
Cited by
240
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
140.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Research in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
discourse, learning, teaching, classroom discourse, language and learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review