Study of Israelite and Jewish Oral and Folk Literature: Problems and Issues
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The traditional dichotomy between orality and literacy is an incorrect division in understanding ancient scribalism.
“the traditional dichotomy between orality and literacy is an incorrect division in understanding ancient scribalism”
From Killing Pharaohs in Exodus: The Anonymity of the Egyptian Kings, the Deconstruction of Their Individuality, and the Egyptian Practice of Damnatio Memoriae (2023) · cites this paper as Jason 1990, p. 55
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Jason, H.
- Corresponding author
- Jason, Heda
- Venue
- Asian Folklore Studies
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69
- ISSN
- 0385-2342 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2796877008
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asian Folklore Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › European Linguistics and Anthropology
- Keywords
- folk literature, Jewish folklore, oral tradition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
