The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethics and Responsibilities in Writing American Indian History
Abstract
Donald L. Fixico, Ethics and Responsibilities in Writing American Indian History, American Indian Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 1, Special Issue: Writing about (Writing about) American Indians (Winter, 1996), pp. 29-39
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Whether it be in medicine, psychology, anthropology, archeology or other fields, our patrons have noted that Indigenous oral knowledge is underused or missing entirely”
From More Than Personal Communication (2021) · cites this paper as Fixico 1996
Citations
Cited by
More Than Personal Communication
MacLeod, L. (2021) · KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies · doi:10.18357/kula.135 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Fixico, D. L.
- Corresponding author
- Fixico, Donald L.
- Venue
- American Indian Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29
- ISSN
- 0095-182X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325242556
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Indian Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- Native American history, historiography, ethical responsibility, representation of indigenous peoples
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
