The DOI matches its Crossref record.
American Indian Intellectualism and the New Indian Story
Abstract
The role of Indians, themselves, in storytelling of Indian America is as much a matter of jurisdiction as is anything else in Indian Country: economics, law, control of resources, property rights. It goes without saying that it reflects our struggle with colonial experience of our concomitant histories. If that sounds benign, it is anything but that. On contrary, how Indian narrative is told, how it is nourished, who tells it, who nourishes it, and consequences of its telling are among most fascinating-and, at same time, chilling-stories of our time. It is true that the American Indian is to many people a bizarre phrase, falling quaintly on unaccustomed ears of those in American mainstream. While there are images of Jewish intellectuals, European intellectuals, British scholars, African novelists there is no image of an American Indian intellectual. There is only that primitive figure who crouches near fire smoking a sacred pipe or, arms outstretched, calls for gods to look down upon his pitiful being. Worse, drunk, demoralized Chingachgook sitting alongside road, a medallion with George Washington's face imprinted on it hanging about his neck. Or Red Power militant of 1960s. It is as though American Indian has no intellectual voice with which to enter into America's important dialogues. The American Indian is not asked what he thinks we should do about Bosnia or Iraq. He is not asked to participate in Charlie Rose's interview program about books or politics or history. It is as though American Indian does not exist except in faux history or corrupt myth. Yet, American Indian population is one of fastest growing minority populations in America and American Indians own and occupy hundreds of thousands of acres of land throughout country, have earned doctorates and other scholarly credentials, and they run their own homelands-based universities and corporations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Whether it be in medicine, psychology, anthropology, archeology or other fields, our patrons have noted that Indigenous oral knowledge is underused or missing entirely”
From More Than Personal Communication (2021) · cites this paper as Cook-Lynn 1996
Citations
Cited by
More Than Personal Communication
MacLeod, L. (2021) · KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies · doi:10.18357/kula.135 · Cited by 67
Marley, T. L. (2019) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764218799130 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook-Lynn, E.
- Corresponding author
- Cook-Lynn, Elizabeth
- Venue
- American Indian Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57
- ISSN
- 0095-182X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036854346
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Indian Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Literature and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Keywords
- Native American stories, storytelling, Native American representation, colonialism, Native American history, Native American identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Indian Intellectualism and the New Indian Story. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1184942
- The paper
- Cook-Lynn, E. (1996). American Indian Intellectualism and the New Indian Story. American Indian Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/1184942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.