Uniform Estimates on the Number of Collisions in Semi-Dispersing Billiards
Abstract
Estimating the number of collisions in a neighborhood of a given is a central problem in the theory of billiard systems. Moreover, the existence of a uniform estimate on the number of collisions is related to various important properties of a billiard system. For example, the Sinai-Chernov formulas for the metric entropy of billiards are proved under the assumption that such an estimate exists ([3], [9]). It is quite obvious that if the boundary of the billiard has any concave parts then a trajectory can have arbitrarily many collisions in a neighborhood of a point of concavity, and sometimes even infinitely many collisions (see, for example [11]). Therefore, the class of billiards for which uniform estimates are possible are the semi-dispersing billiards, which have been studied extensively in the numerous works (see the review in [7]). The most important examples of semi-dispersing billiards are the billiards that correspond to hard balls gas models. Vaserstein (1979, [11]) and Gal'perin (1981, [4]) proved that in semidispersing billiards any trajectory has only finitely many collisions in any finite period of time. Sinai (1978, [8]) proved the existence of a uniform estimate for billiards inside polyhedral angles, and pointed out that his results should also hold for semi-dispersing billiards in a neighborhood of a x with linearly independent normals to the walls of the billiard at x (see the remark at the end of [8]). In this paper we deal with semi-dispersing billiards on arbitrary manifolds. All our results apply to the usual billiards in Rk and Wk. First we prove that for semi-dispersing billiards on arbitrary manifolds any trajectory has only a finite number of collisions in a finite period of time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of trajectories between fixed initial and final configurations is finite.
“They are, however, finite in number and we expect this to be the case more generally [10-13].”
From State-to-State Cosmology: A New View on the Cosmological Arrow of Time and the Past Hypothesis (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kröger, M. (2005) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2005.01.020 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
State-to-State Cosmology: A New View on the Cosmological Arrow of Time and the Past Hypothesis
Deutsch, J. M., & Aguirre, A. (2022) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-022-00597-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burago, D., Ferleger, S., & Kononenko, A.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 695
- ISSN
- 0003-486X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095564544
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Mathematics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Mathematics and Applications
- Keywords
- number of collisions, uniform estimates, metric entropy, billiard trajectories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review