Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications

Open access
Wu, JunJie, Babcock, Bruce A.·1998·American Journal of Agricultural Economics
DOI 10.2307/1244552
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Farmers' management practices can have a significant effect on agricultural pollution. Past research has analyzed factors influencing adoption of a single management practice. But often adoption decisions about many practices are made simultaneously, which suggests use of a polychotomous‐choice model to analyze decisions. Such a model is applied to the choice of alternative management practices on cropland in the Central Nebraska Basin and controlled for self‐selection and the interaction between alternative practices. The results of the choice model are used to estimate the economic and environmental effects of adopting alternative combinations of management practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1244552

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Wu, J., & Babcock, B. A.
Venue
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-08
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
494-511
ISSN
  • 0002-9092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8276
DOI
10.2307/1244552
OpenAlex
W2026093406
Cited by
285
References
0
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1244552
The paper
Wu, J., & Babcock, B. A. (1998). The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244552

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.