Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative Models for Electrical Load Forecasting

Harris, Thomas, Bunn, D. W., Farmer, E. D.·1986·Technometrics

Abstract

This reference describes the methods used to forecast loads on public utility systems, featuring modern documentation and forecasting techniques for lead times of up to approximately 24 hours. Methods include automatic adaptive, univariate, and multivariate. The volume is divided into three parts: an introduction to the general economic and operational decision-making contexts and methods of short-term forecasting; six contributed insights into a wide range of model developments in load forecasting; and further insights into adjacent fields, including essays on the econometric perspective to load forecasting and the very short-term implications of state-estimation for data validation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1268996

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Harris, T., Bunn, D. W., & Farmer, E. D.
Venue
Technometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1986-11
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
403
ISSN
0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034353796
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Models for Electrical Load Forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1268996
The paper
Harris, T., Bunn, D. W., & Farmer, E. D. (1986). Comparative Models for Electrical Load Forecasting. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.