The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimum Experimental Designs
Abstract
Part I. Fundamentals Introduction Some key ideas Experimental strategies The choice of a model Models and least squares Criteria for a good experiment Standard designs The analysis of experiments Part II. Theory and applications Optimum design theory Criteria of optimality Experiments with both qualitative and quantitative factors Blocking response surface designs Restricted region designs Failure of the experiment and design augmentation Non-linear models Optimum Bayesian design Discrimination between models Composite design criteria Further topics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0986 · Cited by 1,540
Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics
Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x · Cited by 825
Bayesian approaches to randomized trials
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Freedman, L. S., & Parmar, M. K. B. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983527 · Cited by 720
Planned missing data designs in psychological research.
Graham, J. W., Taylor, B. J., Olchowski, A. E., & Cumsille, P. E. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.4.323 · Cited by 573
Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior Beliefs
SÁndor, Z., & Wedel, M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.4.430.18904 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, R. E., Atkinson, A. C., & Donev, A. N.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 450
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3097925195
- Cited by
- 1,447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimum Experimental Designs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1270278
- The paper
- Wheeler, R. E., Atkinson, A. C., & Donev, A. N. (1993). Optimum Experimental Designs. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1270278
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
