The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Open accessAbstract
The critical role of street-level bureaucrats -- Street-level bureaucrats as policy makers -- The problem of resources -- Goals and performance measures -- Relations with clients -- Advocacy and alienation in street-level work -- Rationing services : limitation of access and demand -- Rationing services : inequality in administration -- Controlling clients and the work situation -- The client-processing mentality -- The assault on human services : bureaucratic control, accountability, and the fiscal crisis -- The broader context of bureaucratic relations -- Support for human services : notes for reform and reconstruction -- On managing street-level bureaucracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor
Lebovits, H. (2018) · Public Integrity · doi:10.1080/10999922.2018.1511671 · Cited by 3,320
Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health
Szreter, S. (2004) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh013 · Cited by 2,588
A Theory of Racialized Organizations
Ray, V. E. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122418822335 · Cited by 2,182
HACKER, J. S. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404001121 · Cited by 1,543
A future for the world's children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission
Clark, H., Coll-Seck, A. M., Banerjee, A., Peterson, S., Dalglish, S. L., Ameratunga, S., Balabanova, D., Bhan, M. K., Bhutta, Z. A., Borrazzo, J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32540-1 · Cited by 1,105
Metadata
- Authors
- Lipsky, M.
- Corresponding author
- Lipsky, Michael
- Venue
- Michigan Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 811
- ISSN
- 0026-2234 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058869603
- Cited by
- 8,981
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 126 · 2025: 414 · 2024: 492 · 2023: 496 · 2022: 597 · 2021: 628 · 2020: 670 · 2019: 601 · 2018: 458 · 2017: 407 · 2016: 410 · 2015: 403 · 2014: 419 · 2013: 335 · 2012: 314
- FWCI
- 67.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.gbv.de
- Locations
- Michigan Law Review (publishedVersion)
- Ethics
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- street-level bureaucracy, public service delivery, human services, bureaucratic control, customer relationships, access to public services, bureaucratic accountability, fiscal crisis, public policy implementation, service delivery reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
