Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Arctic and Alpine Vegetations: Similarities, Differences, and Susceptibility to Disturbance

Billings, W. D.·1973·BioScience

Abstract

Arctic and Alpine vegetations along a latitudinal gradient from the equitorial Andean Páramos to the Polar Deserts of the Canadian High Arctic are all adapted to low daily mean temperatures during the growing season. They differ in almost all other respects: environmentally, biologically, and in their susceptibility to disturbance by man.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1296827

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Billings, W. D.
Venue
BioScience
Published
1973-12
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
697-704
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W1984836060
Cited by
309
References
0
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arctic and Alpine Vegetations: Similarities, Differences, and Susceptibility to Disturbance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1296827
The paper
Billings, W. D. (1973). Arctic and Alpine Vegetations: Similarities, Differences, and Susceptibility to Disturbance. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.2307/1296827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.