The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide Use
Abstract
W orldwide, approximately 2.5 million tons of pesticides are applied each year with a purchase price of $20 billion (Pesticide News 1990). In the United States, approximately 500,000 tons of 600 different types of pesticides are used annually at a cost of $4.1 billion, including application costs (Pimentel et al. 1991). Pesticides make a significant contribution to maintaining world food production. In general, each dollar invested in pesticide control returns approximately $4 in crops saved. Estimates are that losses to pests would increase 10% if no pesticides were used at all; specific crop losses would range from zero to nearly 100%. Despite the widespread use of pesticides in the United States, pests (principally insects, plant pathogens, and weeds) destroy 37% of all potential food and fiber crops (Pimentel 1990). Although pesticides are generally profitable, their use does not always decrease crop losses. For example, even with the tenfold increase in insecticide use in the United States from 1945 to 1989, total crop losses from insect damage have nearly doubled from 7% to 13% (Pimentel et al. 1991). This rise in crop losses to in-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Savary, S., Ficke, A., Aubertot, J.-N., & Hollier, C. (2012) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-012-0200-5 · Cited by 1,208
A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity
Chaplin‐Kramer, R., O’Rourke, M. E., Blitzer, E. J., & Kremen, C. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01642.x · Cited by 1,037
Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis
Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4 · Cited by 474
ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR MANAGING THE USE OF LAND1
Dale, V. H., Brown, S., Haeuber, R. A., Hobbs, N. T., Huntly, N., Naiman, R. J., Riebsame, W. E., Turner, M. G., & Valone, T. J. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0639:epagfm]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 444
Agricultural landscape simplification and insecticide use in the Midwestern United States
Meehan, T. D., Werling, B. P., Landis, D. A., & Gratton, C. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1100751108 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Pimentel, D., Acquay, H., Biltonen, M., Rice, P., Silva, M., Nelson, J., Lipner, V., Giordano, S., Horowitz, A., & D'Amore, M.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 750-760
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2004315377
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1311994
- The paper
- Pimentel, D., Acquay, H., Biltonen, M., Rice, P., Silva, M., Nelson, J., Lipner, V., Giordano, S., Horowitz, A., & D'Amore, M. (1992). Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide Use. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.