Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acid Rain Impacts on Calcium Nutrition and Forest Health

DeHayes, Donald H., Schaberg, Paul G., Hawley, Gary J., Strimbeck, G. Richard·1999·BioScience

Abstract

Forest ecosystems throughout the world are exposed to acid rain, a complex solution consisting largely of H+, SO42−, NH4+, and NO3− pollutant ions derived from sulfur and nitrogen oxides. Although the public in the United States may view acid deposition as a localized pollution issue specific to certain regions of North America and northern Europe, recent evidence of acidic deposition throughout much of Asia, including tropical forest regions, has demonstrated that acid deposition is actually a global phenomenon (Abate 1995). Furthermore, despite downward trends in sulfate concentrations associated with reductions in sulfur dioxide emissions mandated by the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, the acidity of precipitation in eastern North America does not seem to be decreasing (Scherbatskoy et al. in press). For example, over the course of 10 fog events on the summit of Mt. Mansfield, Vermont (elevation 1237 m), during summer 1998, the cloud water had an average pH of 2.8, with several events of pH 2.1–2.5 (Sean Lawson and Timothy Scherbatskoy, personal communication, data on file at the School of Natural Resources, The University of Vermont). The median and minimum cloud water pH values from Mt. Mansfield are more acidic than comparable summer measurements made on nearby Whiteface Mountain, New York (elevation 1483 m), from 1982 to 1987 (pH 3.4–3.8; Mohnen 1992). These findings collectively highlight the severity of cloud water acidity engulfing montane forests in the eastern United States and the ongoing nature of acid deposition. The prevalence and persistence of acid deposition has fueled public concern about the widespread impact of acid rain on forest health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1313570

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
DeHayes, D. H., Schaberg, P. G., Hawley, G. J., & Strimbeck, G. R.
Venue
BioScience
Published
1999-10
Volume
49
Issue
10
Pages
789-800
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2140266995
Cited by
285
References
23
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acid Rain Impacts on Calcium Nutrition and Forest Health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1313570
The paper
DeHayes, D. H., Schaberg, P. G., Hawley, G. J., & Strimbeck, G. R. (1999). Acid Rain Impacts on Calcium Nutrition and Forest Health. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313570

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.