The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Humanizing the College Classroom: Collaborative Learning and Social Organization among Students
Abstract
We show how to use collaborative learninggroups (CLGs) during scheduled class periods to facilitate students' learning. First we discuss faculty members'misgivings about CLGs. Some of these may be related to the human relations school, which led managers to believe that they could exploit workers' informal ties to increase productivity. Sociologists criticized the manipulative tendencies of this school, but critics may have turned the discipline away from the nonexploitative use of small groups even from the study of group dynamics. As a result, most sociologists are unaware of research how collaborative learning groups can improve students' academic performance, social skills, ability to take the perspective of others. We present strategies procedures for using CLGs in college classrooms. Specifically, we show 1) how to keep groups on task, 2) how to eliminate 'free riders, and 3) how to reduce the number of students who are either dominants or isolates in their groups. Next we examine test data, interaction preferences among classmates, students' written evaluations of the group experience. Wefind that students do better test material which was discussed in group sessions, that connections to classmates increase significantly, that the great majority of students laud the use of CLGs. Because our results are provisional, we close with a problemsolving agenda that will help to answer unresolved questions about the use effectiveness of collaborative learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”
Bruffee, K. A. (1984) · College English · doi:10.2307/376924 · Cited by 1,016
Cited by
Classroom organization and participation: college students’ perceptions
Weaver, R. R., & Qi, J. (2005) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2005.11772299 · Cited by 393
Effects of Small-Group Learning on Transfer: a Meta-Analysis
Pai, H.-H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9260-8 · Cited by 140
Collaboration and Its Discontents: Steps toward Overcoming Barriers to Successful Group Projects
Yamane, D. (1996) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318875 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Rau, W., & Heyl, B. S.
- Venue
- Teaching Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141
- ISSN
- 0092-055X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016320057
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.