Cited by 5,300Race, History, and American SocietyDiscrimination and Equality LawLaw, Rights, and Freedoms

Whiteness as Property

Open access
Harris, Cheryl I.·1993·Harvard Law Review

Abstract

Issues regarding race and racial identity as well as questions pertaining to property rights and ownership have been prominent in much public discourse in the United States. In this article, Professor Harris contributes to this discussion by positing that racial identity and property are deeply interrelated concepts. Professor Harris examines how whiteness, initially constructed as a form of racial identity, evolved into a form of property, historically and presently acknowledged and protected in American law. Professor Harris traces the origins of whiteness as property in the parallel systems of domination of Black and Native American peoples out of which were created racially contingent forms of property and property rights. Following the period of slavery and conquest, whiteness became the basis of racialized privilege - a type of status in which white racial identity provided the basis for allocating societal benefits both private and public in character. These arrangements were ratified and legitimated in law as a type of status property. Even as legal segregation was overturned, whiteness as property continued to serve as a barrier to effective change as the system of racial classification operated to protect entrenched power.Next, Professor Harris examines how the concept of whiteness as property persists in current perceptions of racial identity, in the law's misperception of group identity and in the Court's reasoning and decisions in the arena of affirmative action.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1341787

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • White rights and demands to property and ownership were often developed and exercised in relation to the continued disenfranchisement, displacement, and dehumanization of African Americans and indigenous peoples.

    “white rights and demands to property and ownership were often developed and exercised in relation to the (continued) disenfranchisement, displacement, and dehumanization of African Americans and indigenous peoples”

    From Race and (the Study of) Esotericism (2020) · cites this paper as Harris, 1993

  • "Unmarked" digital content, services, and artifacts are commonly understood as white, as belonging to whiteness, and as "civilized" until a nonwhite actor or group is seen utilizing them.

    “This latter assertion leads to my own claim that “unmarked” digital content, services, and artifacts are commonly understood as white, as belonging to whiteness, and as “civilized” until a nonwhite actor or group is seen utilizing them.”

    From Distributed Blackness: African American Cybercultures (2020) · cites this paper as Harris, 1993

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 5,300

Authors
Harris, C. I.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, Cheryl I.
Venue
Harvard Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1993-06
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
1707
ISSN
0017-811X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W46302826
Cited by
5,300
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 329 · 2025: 460 · 2024: 424 · 2023: 480 · 2022: 465 · 2021: 450 · 2020: 346 · 2019: 340 · 2018: 250 · 2017: 196 · 2016: 147 · 2015: 146 · 2014: 168 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 129
FWCI
42.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Harvard Law Review (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Keywords
whiteness as property, racial identity, property rights, racial classification, affirmative action, slavery, Native American tribes, racial domination, racial hierarchy, distributive justice, United States law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review