The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Economic Structure of Tort Law
Abstract
Written by a lawyer and an economist, this is the first full-length economic study of tort law--the body of law that governs liability for accidents and for intentional wrongs such as battery and defamation. Landes and Posner propose that tort law is best understood as a system for achieving an efficient allocation of resources to safety--that, on the whole, rules and doctrines of tort law encourage the optimal investment in safety by potential injurers and potential victims. The book contains both a comprehensive description of the major doctrines of tort law and a series of formal economic models used to explore the economic properties of these doctrines. All the formal models are translated into simple commonsense terms so that the math less reader can follow the text without difficulty; legal jargon is also avoided, for the sake of economists and other readers not trained in the law. Although the primary focus is on explaining existing doctrines rather than on exploring their implementation by juries, insurance adjusters, and other real world actors, the book has obvious pertinence to the ongoing controversies over damage awards, insurance rates and availability, and reform of tort law-in fact it is an essential prerequisite to sound reform. Among other timely topics, the authors discuss punitive damage awards in products liability cases, the evolution of products liability law, and the problem of liability for mass disaster torts, such as might be produced by a nuclear accident. More generally, this book is an important contribution to the law and economics movement, the most exciting and controversial development in modern legal education and scholarship, andwill become an obligatory reference for all who are concerned with the study of tort law.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change
Nelson, R. A. (2000) · Theorien der Organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80840-0_5 · Cited by 1,307
Claims, Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation
Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., Gawande, A. A., Gandhi, T. K., Kachalia, A., Yoon, C., Puopolo, A. L., & Brennan, T. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa054479 · Cited by 848
Global value chain governance: A relational perspective
Kano, L. (2018) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-017-0086-8 · Cited by 346
Some Economics of Trade Secret Law
Friedman, D. D., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.61 · Cited by 282
Self-citationEconomic Theories of Legal Liability
Cooter, R. D. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.3.11 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, J., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A.
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 211
- ISSN
- 0008-4085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014253920
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Economic Structure of Tort Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/135223
- The paper
- Palmer, J., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1988). The Economic Structure of Tort Law. The Canadian Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/135223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.