The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Canonicity in Cuneiform Texts
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In some cases, such as the assumed twenty-ninth aḫû tablet of EAE , elements of aḫû omens are similar to entries in the corresponding tablets of EAE , even if the specific content of these omens is different.”
From New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia (2021) · cites this paper as Rochberg-Halton 1984
In the citing paper
“In Assyriological discussions of canonization, where questions of authority have played an outsized role, scholars across the canon-non-canon spectrum have widely agreed that certain texts were considered authoritative by the first millennium.”
From New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia (2021) · cites this paper as Rochberg-Halton 1984
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Childsnotes, (Childs,Introductionp. 50;see alsoH. W.Beyer,'icavdv,'inTheologicalDictionaryof the New Testament, 3, 1964
- Hallo W. W., 1958, HUCA, 29, 88
- 1962, 21-26
- Kraus F. R., 1935, MVAG, 40, 38
- TheAssumed29thabdTabletof EnimnaAnuEnlil,"inF
- Weidner E.F., 1941, AfO, 14, 175f
- JackGoody,TheDomesticationof theSavageMind(Cambridge,1977),andalsoJack Goody and Ian Watt,"TheConsequencesof Literacy,"in J. R. Goody, ed.Literacyin TraditionalSocieties(Cambridge,1968)pp.27-68.
- 1957, 9
- 1962, 72
- 1957, 7-8;on theauthorOannes-Adapa,see Lambert,JCS16(1962)73-74;andseealsoLambert,"EnmedurankiandRelated Matters,"JCS21 (1967)132f
- 1967, 132-33
- 1967, 127
- 1957, 8 andn. 31
- 1957, 8
- 1962, 16
- 1941, AfO, 14, 4
- Comparealso, accordingto anotherscholar,"K.11092+ii 28, cited CAD S s.v. ?andadj.mng. 1 b l'-a
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia
Wainer, Z. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.1.0143 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochberg-Halton, F.
- Corresponding author
- Rochberg-Halton, Francesca
- Venue
- Journal of Cuneiform Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-144
- ISSN
- 0022-0256 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-6737
- OpenAlex
- W2334061630
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cuneiform Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- canonicity, cuneiform tablets, textual transmission, canon formation, scribal practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
