The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thermal Tolerance of Avian Embryos: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Avian eggs usually experience temperatures of 30 to 40°C during the incubation period, but eggs often cool to much lower temperatures. Hyperthermia is less common. Passerines do not show higher incubation temperatures than other orders that have been studied extensively. Field measurements of incubation temperatures are usually lower than the optimal temperatures for development found in laboratory studies. Some species regulate egg temperatures closely throughout incubation; but in at least one penguin species, mean egg temperature increases and ranges of egg temperature decrease through the incubation period. Both the optimal temperature for continuous exposure and the range of temperatures producing high survivorship differ among species. Species also differ in their responses to temperature exposures of limited duration. Thus, the use of a "physiological zero" applicable to all species is not warranted. Penguins have both a lower optimum and a broader range of acceptable incubation temperatures than do other species studied. Age, duration, and temperature of exposure significantly affect survivorship. Hyperthermia is evidently more injurious to the developing embryo than is hypothermia. Resistance to cold exposure is a heritable trait, but the genetics and physiology of the response(s) are not known. For older embryos, the physiological effects of hyperthermia are similar to those of adult birds in terms of the organ systems that are first to fail. An estimate of thermal tolerance for short exposures in most species studied is 16 to 41°C and, for exposures lasting several hours, 36 to 39°C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Limb proportions show developmental plasticity in response to embryo movement
Pollard, A. S., Charlton, B. G., Hutchinson, J. R., Gustafsson, T., McGonnell, I. M., Timmons, J. A., & Pitsillides, A. A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep41926 · Cited by 2,364
The critical thermal maximum: history and critique
Lutterschmidt, W. I., & Hutchison, V. H. (1997) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z97-783 · Cited by 919
Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay
Eggers, S., Griesser, M., Nystrand, M., & Ekman, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3373 · Cited by 386
Thermoregulation in endotherms: physiological principles and ecological consequences
Rezende, E. L., & Bacigalupe, L. D. (2015) · Journal of Comparative Physiology B · doi:10.1007/s00360-015-0909-5 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, D. R.
- Venue
- The Condor
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 874
- ISSN
- 0010-5422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967988007
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal Tolerance of Avian Embryos: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1368537
- The paper
- Webb, D. R. (1987). Thermal Tolerance of Avian Embryos: A Review. The Condor. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.