The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Seattle Compromise: Multicultural Sensitivity and Americanization
Open accessAbstract
Obstetrician to Pregnant Woman: "If it's a boy, do you want him circumcised?"Pregnant Woman: "Yes, and also if it's a girl." 1 An effective society-one that can accomplish its common goals, facilitate the private ends of its members, and nourish its system of values-requires that newcomers achieve at least a modest degree of assimilation into its culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In parallel, in the 1990s as European and North American countries received increased numbers of immigrants from countries where FGM/C is practiced, several proposals were drafted recommending offering pricking in lieu of more severe forms of cutting in children old enough to give consent and for those families where any prevention strategy did not work.”
From Medicalized Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Contentious Practices and Persistent Debates (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“each of these proposals ignited public outrage and were never implemented.”
From Medicalized Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Contentious Practices and Persistent Debates (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–124 of 124
Ethical aspects of medically unnecessary child genital cutting
Wiśniowska, K. (2020) · Analiza i Egzystencja · doi:10.18276/aie.2020.51-03 · Cited by 1
(2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118192337.biblio
Song, S. Y. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490354.007
Carens, J. H. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0198297688.003.0010
A Novel Legal Remedy: Female Genital Mutilation Protection Orders
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.003.0006
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.003.0007
Criminalising Female Genital Mutilation
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.003.0003
The Barriers to Criminalising FGM
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.003.0004
(2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0198297688.001.0001.002.004
(2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0198297688.001.0001.002.003
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195305396.001.0001.002.004
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195305396.002.0001
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195305396.001.0001.002.003
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0012
Dias, D. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0005
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0004
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0007
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.005.0001
Hussein, L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0006
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0011
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0010
Proudman, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864608.002.0003
Examining Female Genital Mutilation Laws and Improving Policing Responses
Proudman, C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74504-1_4
Griffiths, D. H. (2011) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, D. L.
- Corresponding author
- Coleman, Doriane Lambelet
- Venue
- Duke Law Journal
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 717
- ISSN
- 0012-7086 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1562793863
- Semantic Scholar
- 2f1a38b77b2624dec8b34305819af300bc170218
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 40.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Duke Law Journal (publishedVersion)
- Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- multicultural sensitivity, Americanization, assimilation, immigrants, cultural pluralism, multiculturalism, national identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
