Feeding Ecology of Central Chilean Foxes, Dusicyon culpaeus and Dusicyon griseus
Abstract
We examined 318 scats of Dusicyon culpaeus and 278 of D. griseus, collected in central Chile between 1973 and 1978; they represented all seasons except winter. Both species preyed mainly upon rodents (diurnal, crepuscular, or nocturnal) that inhabited open vegetation patches. Frequency of occurrence of rodent prey items in the droppings tended to match their relative abundance in the field. Predation upon rabbits was rare and mainly on juveniles. A small number of birds, avian eggs, and snakes were eaten. Mean size of rodent prey remained constant from spring to fall, as estimated by the average dimensions of adult rodents represented in the droppings. Moreover, mean size of rodent prey did not differ significantly between fox species throughout the year. Numbers of droppings that contained berries increased from spring to fall. We concluded that central Chilean foxes were crepuscular, opportunistic predators that hunted in open patches of vegetation. Similarities in their feeding ecology suggest that competitive exclusion may be important in the maintenance of their allopatric distributions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Small rodents are a fundamental prey item in the Andean fox's diet, often representing the most consumed component in various regions.
“Small rodents are a fundamental prey item in its diet, often representing the most consumed component in various regions (Jaksic et al. 1980;Jaksic et al. 1981;Iriarte et al. 1989;Ebensperger et al. 1991;Zapata et al. 2005;Walker et al. 2007;Pia 2013).”
From The Andean fox Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782) in southwestern Colombia: diet and anatomical description (2026) · cites this paper as Jaksic et al. 1980
The Andean fox also consumes birds and reptiles.
“Additionally, it also consumes birds and reptiles (Jaksic et al. 1980;Jaksic et al. 1981;Iriarte et al. 1989;Ebensperger et al. 1991;Carevic et al. 2019)”
From The Andean fox Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782) in southwestern Colombia: diet and anatomical description (2026) · cites this paper as Jaksic et al. 1980
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 2 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Jaksi, F. M., Schlatter, R. P., & Yanez, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-05-20
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-260
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- OpenAlex
- W2057338919
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Mammalogy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- Andean fox, feeding ecology, scat analysis, rodent prey, prey size, seasonal variation, crepuscular activity, opportunistic predation, competitive exclusion, allopatric distribution, central Chile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review