Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mammal Sounds and Motivation-Structural Rules: A Test of the Hypothesis

August, P. V., Anderson, J. G. T.·1987·Journal of Mammalogy

Abstract

We tested if mammal sounds given in aggressive and fearful/friendly contexts showed acoustic design characteristics in accordance with the Motivation-Structural (MS) rule hypothesis (Morton, 1977). Our data were taken from literature and consist of 76 aggressive sounds and 75 fearful/friendly sounds from 50 species of mammals. Aggressive sounds are of low-frequency and wide bandwidth and thus support MS rule predictions. Fearful/friendly sounds show a trend toward conforming to MS rule design expectations (high-frequency and tonal) but exhibit considerable variation. This variation may be due to the existence of acoustic parameters other than frequency or bandwidth that might convey motivation information in fearful/friendly contexts. In addition, fear and friendliness represent two very different motivation states in mammals and MS rules may not apply to both.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1381039

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
August, P. V., & Anderson, J. G. T.
Venue
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
1987-02-27
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1542
OpenAlex
W2333873577
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mammal Sounds and Motivation-Structural Rules: A Test of the Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1381039
The paper
August, P. V., & Anderson, J. G. T. (1987). Mammal Sounds and Motivation-Structural Rules: A Test of the Hypothesis. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381039

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.