The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variation in Mammalian Physiological Responses to a Condensed Tannin and Its Ecological Implications
Abstract
Mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ), domestic sheep ( Ovis aries ), and American black bears ( Ursus americanus ) were fed quebracho ( Schinopsis sp.) tannin to determine the contribution of salivary proteins to nitrogen- and fiber-digestive efficiencies and tannin metabolism. These values were compared to previously published values for laboratory rats ( Rattus rattus ) and prairie voles ( Microtus ochrogaster ). Mule deer, black bears, and laboratory rats consuming this condensed tannin produced tannin-binding salivary proteins that reduced fecal-nitrogen losses per unit of ingested tannin and reduced tannin metabolism relative to domestic sheep and prairie voles. Digestibility of the plant fiber was reduced significantly by tannins in domestic sheep, but not in mule deer. Although virtually all ingested tannin (98.3 ± 5.0%) was recovered in feces of mule deer and black bears, ca. 25% was not recovered in feces of domestic sheep and presumably was metabolized. The defensive role of tannins as digestion inhibitors or toxins is dependent upon the molecular characteristics of the tannin interacting with the physiological capability of the animal. Results from one plant-mammal interaction cannot be used to interpret others without an understanding of the characteristics of the tannins and the physiology, ecology, and evolution of the animal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Min, B. R., Barry, T. N., Attwood, G. T., & McNabb, W. C. (2003) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00041-5 · Cited by 1,051
Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health
Mueller‐Harvey, I. (2006) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2577 · Cited by 965
Phenolics in ecological interactions: The importance of oxidation
Appel, H. M. (1993) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00984895 · Cited by 710
Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity
Provenza, F. D., Villalba, J. J., Dziba, L. E., Atwood, S. B., & Banner, R. E. (2003) · Small Ruminant Research · doi:10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00143-3 · Cited by 561
Forage Legumes for Grazing and Conserving in Ruminant Production Systems
Phelan, P., Moloney, A. P., McGeough, E. J., Humphreys, J., Bertilsson, J., O’Riordan, E. G., & O’Kiely, P. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2014.898455 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Robbins, C. T., Hagerman, A. E., Austin, P. J., McArthur, C., & Hanley, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-08-16
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-486
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- OpenAlex
- W2123414309
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in Mammalian Physiological Responses to a Condensed Tannin and Its Ecological Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1382130
- The paper
- Robbins, C. T., Hagerman, A. E., Austin, P. J., McArthur, C., & Hanley, T. A. (1991). Variation in Mammalian Physiological Responses to a Condensed Tannin and Its Ecological Implications. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.