Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Population Cycles Revisited

Krebs, C. J.·1996·Journal of Mammalogy

Abstract

Periodic fluctuations or cycles in populations of small mammals have been widely studied, but much controversy still exists about their causes. Cycles of voles and lemmings are produced by the integrated effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and the problem is to define accurately how these interact. Spacing behavior is a key component of population regulation in voles and lemmings, and this is illustrated most dramatically by the fence effect. We do not know which mechanisms produce changes in social behavior. Phenotypic changes produced by maternal effects or stress are now believed most likely, but there has been too little work done on genetic effects on spacing and we know almost nothing about kin-related social behavior in voles and lemmings. Both predation and food supply may be the extrinsic factors involved in cyclic population dynamics. Single-factor experiments suggest that food shortage by itself does not seem to be a necessary factor for cycles nor does predation, but the interaction between food and predation could be a key variable in understanding how extrinsic factors affect cycles of voles. Cycles of snowshoe hares are caused by an interaction between predation and food supplies, possibly integrated through risk-sensitive foraging. Spacing behavior is not a component of cycles of hares because snowshoe hares differ from voles and lemmings in having no known form of spacing behavior that can produce social mortality. The short-term cycle of voles and lemmings thus seems to have a different explanation from the long-term cycle of snowshoe hares. In some places, lemmings may be locked in a predator-pit at low density. Experimental exclusion of predators improved survival of adults in a population of collared lemmings, but was not sufficient to allow them to escape the predator-pit because of losses of juveniles. Whether cyclic populations of lemmings also fall into a predator-pit in the low phase remains to be determined. The low phase does not occur in every cycle and it is particularly difficult to explain. Progress in analyzing cyclic fluctuations has been made most rapidly when we define clear alternative hypotheses and carry out experimental manipulations on field populations. Much remains to be done on these small mammals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1382705

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Krebs, C. J.
Venue
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
1996-02-16
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
8-24
ISSN
  • 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1542
OpenAlex
W2119602524
Cited by
327
References
0
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population Cycles Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1382705
The paper
Krebs, C. J. (1996). Population Cycles Revisited. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382705

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.