Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal Foraging and Risk of Predation: Effects on Behavior and Social Structure in Ungulates

Kie, J. G.·1999·Journal of Mammalogy

Abstract

Optimal foraging theory predicts that animals will either attempt to maximize energy gained or minimize time spent to obtain a fixed amount of energy. A time-minimizing approach implies that an animal is attempting to maximize time spent in other behaviors such as reproduction or to minimize its exposure to temperature extremes, predators, or some other factor in the environment while foraging. Indeed, many ungulates must balance the need to obtain sufficient energy and other nutrients required for maintenance, growth, and reproduction while avoiding predation. Adopting social behavior that results in the formation of herds confers several advantages to the individual because of the difficulty a predator has in approaching large groups, or in capturing individuals in the confusion caused by a fleeing herd. Such behavior is often seen in ungulates occurring in open habitats where coursing predators are common. The problem becomes more acute, however, for ungulates living in closed habitats year-round, where predators commonly hunt by stealth, or for those sex and age classes such as females with young that exhibit solitary behavior. Such species or sex and age classes would be expected to exhibit a time-minimizing strategy at least seasonally. Use of linear-programming models of dietary choice have been successful in predicting classes of forages consumed by ungulates and other generalist herbivores and indicate that they often follow an energy-maximization strategy. Nonetheless, overwhelming evidence indicates that ungulates modify their behavior in the presence of predators. I suggest that decisions about when and how to forage are being made at different scales, and these differences may account for observed discrepancies between models and empirical evidence. Finally, new analytical techniques such as stochastic dynamic programming may allow development of more realistic models of foraging behavior and may better incorporate observed behaviors in ungulates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1383163

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Kie, J. G.
Venue
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
1999-12-06
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
1114-1129
ISSN
  • 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1542
OpenAlex
W1984603204
Cited by
274
References
3
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Foraging and Risk of Predation: Effects on Behavior and Social Structure in Ungulates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1383163
The paper
Kie, J. G. (1999). Optimal Foraging and Risk of Predation: Effects on Behavior and Social Structure in Ungulates. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383163

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.