Cited by 13Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

“Invisible” Religions: Some Preliminary Evidence

Machalek, Richard, Martin, Michael·1976·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

One historic function of institutionalized religion is the designation of life's ultimate concerns and the provision of strategies for coping with them. Yinger's functional definition of religion is used in this study to discern (1) what the residents of an urban neighborhood in the Deep South define as life's ultimate concerns, and (2) the strategies they use to cope with them. The findings help support Luckmann's contention of the existence of invisible religions in modem society and disclose the existence of privatized expressions of religiosity possibly unconnected with formally organized, institutionalized forms. The data lend credibility to those theoretical innovations which conceive of religion in very broad terms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1385634

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Machalek, R., & Martin, M.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1976-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
311
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318568622
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
invisible religion, ultimate concern, coping strategies, institutional religion, Luckmann, urban residents, Deep South

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review