The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences
Abstract
Using cultural anthropology to analyze debates that reverberate throughout the human sciences, George E. Marcus and Michael M. J. Fischer look closely at cultural anthropology's past accomplishments, its current predicaments, its future direction, and the insights it has to offer other fields of study. The result is a provocative work that is important for scholars interested in a critical approach to social science, art, literature, and history, as well as anthropology. This second edition considers new challenges to the field which have arisen since the book's original publication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1994) · Cited by 13,126
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275112457914 · Cited by 4,349
Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002) · doi:10.4135/9781849208871 · Cited by 4,118
(2006) · Cited by 2,256
Beyond “Culture”: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1992) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00020 · Cited by 2,003
Metadata
- Authors
- Laitin, D. D., Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J.
- Venue
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423
- ISSN
- 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979731710
- Cited by
- 3,658
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 352.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1386453
- The paper
- Laitin, D. D., Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1987). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.