Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,658

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences

Laitin, David D., Marcus, George E., Fischer, Michael M. J.·1987·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

Using cultural anthropology to analyze debates that reverberate throughout the human sciences, George E. Marcus and Michael M. J. Fischer look closely at cultural anthropology's past accomplishments, its current predicaments, its future direction, and the insights it has to offer other fields of study. The result is a provocative work that is important for scholars interested in a critical approach to social science, art, literature, and history, as well as anthropology. This second edition considers new challenges to the field which have arisen since the book's original publication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1386453

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,658

Metadata

Authors
Laitin, D. D., Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-09
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
423
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979731710
Cited by
3,658
References
0
FWCI
352.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1386453
The paper
Laitin, D. D., Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1987). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386453

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.