Religion and spirituality: unfuzzying the fuzzy
Abstract
Brian J. Zinnbauer, Kenneth I. Pargament, Brenda Cole, Mark S. Rye, Eric M. Butter, Timothy G. Belavich, Kathleen M. Hipp, Allie B. Scott, Jill L. Kadar, Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 36, No. 4 (Dec., 1997), pp. 549-564
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pattern of H/S/R self-identification among people entering prison in Oregon is roughly the same as that found in the general community, although people entering prison in Oregon may differ from the general population of Oregon in how they answer this question.
“This is roughly the same pattern that has been found in the general community, although people entering prison in Oregon may be different than the general population of Oregon in how they answer this question.”
From The Sociology of Humanist, Spiritual, and Religious Practice in Prison: Supporting Responsivity and Desistance from Crime (2011) · cites this paper as [22]
One study with a general community sample from another state found that 74% were spiritual and religious, 19% were spiritual but not religious, 4% were religious but not spiritual, and 3% were neither religious nor spiritual.
“One study with a general community sample from another state found that 74% were”
From The Sociology of Humanist, Spiritual, and Religious Practice in Prison: Supporting Responsivity and Desistance from Crime (2011) · cites this paper as [22]
In a cited study, 3% of respondents were neither religious nor spiritual.
“and 3% were”
From The Sociology of Humanist, Spiritual, and Religious Practice in Prison: Supporting Responsivity and Desistance from Crime (2011) · cites this paper as [22]
Only in the last decades, spirituality has been detached from religiosity as a distinct construct.
“Only in the last decades, spirituality has been detached from religiosity as a distinct construct, even though the scientific community still refers to this research field using the “dual” term religiosity/spirituality (R/S; Zinnbauer et al., 1997; Bauer and Johnson, 2019).”
From Defining spirituality in healthcare: a systematic review and conceptual framework. (2021) · cites this paper as Zinnbauer et al., 1997
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 1,543
- Authors
- Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, T. G., Hipp, K. M., Scott, A. B., & Kadar, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Bowling Green State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549
- ISSN
- 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049183155
- Semantic Scholar
- a0cafc0750f2ae35930f02b8fd0be81fb436d636
- Cited by
- 1,543
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Keywords
- religion, spirituality, conceptual definitions, fuzzy concepts, conceptual clarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review