Cited by 50Religion and Society InteractionsReproductive Health and ContraceptionReligion and Society in Latin America

Catholic/Protestant Trends on Abortion: Convergence and Polarity

Sullins, D. Paul·1999·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

Using data from the 1972-1996 General Social Surveys, no difference greater than sampling variation is found between Protestants and Catholics in the most recent 5-year period (1992-1996) in the proportion holding either a pro-life or a pro-choice position on abortion. Sociological factors underlying this convergence are found to be: a steep decline in church attendance over the period among Catholics, but not Protestants; increasing variance from church teaching even among the highly committed; and strong polarixation in opinion by age. A loglinear model fitting contrasting linear trends for Protestants and Catholics in successive 5-year categories of age, cohort and period provides an extremely close fit to the data. However, younger, highly committed Protestants (even liberal Protestants) are growing much more restrictive and while younger, highly committed Catholics are growing much more permissive on abortion. This combination of within-group polarization and between-group convergence provides qualified support for the thesis of religious restructuring advanced by Wuthnow and Hunter, but more detailed analysis reveals complex countercurrents of opinion that defy theoretical systematization. It is argued that the future behavior of the opposing trends - whether they continue, producing a new divergence, or diminish, producing continued equivalence - will adjudicate between theoretical strategies for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1387757

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullins, D. P.
Corresponding author
Sullins, D. Paul
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1999-09
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
354
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314098749
Cited by
50
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society in Latin America
Keywords
abortion attitudes, Catholics, Protestants, religious convergence, religious polarization, church attendance decline, religious commitment, log-linear models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review