Catholic/Protestant Trends on Abortion: Convergence and Polarity
Abstract
Using data from the 1972-1996 General Social Surveys, no difference greater than sampling variation is found between Protestants and Catholics in the most recent 5-year period (1992-1996) in the proportion holding either a pro-life or a pro-choice position on abortion. Sociological factors underlying this convergence are found to be: a steep decline in church attendance over the period among Catholics, but not Protestants; increasing variance from church teaching even among the highly committed; and strong polarixation in opinion by age. A loglinear model fitting contrasting linear trends for Protestants and Catholics in successive 5-year categories of age, cohort and period provides an extremely close fit to the data. However, younger, highly committed Protestants (even liberal Protestants) are growing much more restrictive and while younger, highly committed Catholics are growing much more permissive on abortion. This combination of within-group polarization and between-group convergence provides qualified support for the thesis of religious restructuring advanced by Wuthnow and Hunter, but more detailed analysis reveals complex countercurrents of opinion that defy theoretical systematization. It is argued that the future behavior of the opposing trends - whether they continue, producing a new divergence, or diminish, producing continued equivalence - will adjudicate between theoretical strategies for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Relative to Protestantism, Catholicism did not significantly predict greater perception of abortion risk.
“(Not surprisingly (Sullins, 1999), relative to Protestantism Catholicism did not significantly predict greater perception of abortion risk.).”
From Culture and Identity‐Protective Cognition: Explaining the White‐Male Effect in Risk Perception (2007) · cites this paper as Sullins, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes Toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda
Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (2003) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290305600410 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
“The dropoff is almost entirely confined to Republicans, which, again, poses some questions to which we will return.”
BackgroundCulture and Identity‐Protective Cognition: Explaining the White‐Male Effect in Risk Perception
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (2007) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“(Not surprisingly (Sullins 1999), relative to Protestantism, Catholicism did not significantly predict greater perception of abortion risk.).”
BackgroundAttitudes Toward Abortion among Religious Traditions in the United States: Change or Continuity?
Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2005) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.2307/4153084 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“However, younger age cohorts have become slightly less permissive (Sullins 1999).”
BackgroundEllison, C. G., Echevarria, S., & Smith, B. W. (2005) · doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00298.x · Cited by 108
Spiritual Genograms: A Generational Approach to Assessing Spirituality
Hodge, D. R. (2001) · Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services · doi:10.1606/1044-3894.220 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“…Hunter (1991) refers to as an epistemologicallybased religious restructuring, it is important to note that denominational affiliations, and even religious preference to some extent, are growing less significant as indictors of personal spiritual orientation (Hoffmann & Miller, 1998; Sullins, 1999).”
BackgroundReligion and attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide and terminal palliative care
Burdette, A. M., Hill, T. D., & Moulton, B. E. (2005) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00266.x · Cited by 93
“Sullins (1999) also finds that church attendance plays an important role in determining public opinion.”
BackgroundAttitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students
Hess, J., & Rueb, J. D. (2005) · doi:10.1007/s12144-005-1002-0 · Cited by 84
Begun, S., & Walls, N. (2015) · doi:10.1177/0886109914555216 · Cited by 81
“More recently, Catholic youth have begun to demonstrate more tolerance toward abortion, which may divorce, remarriages, and contraception (Sullins, 1999).”
BackgroundSocial and cultural determinants of attitudes toward abortion: a test of Reiss’ hypotheses
Wang, G.-Z., & Buffalo, M. (2004) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2003.10.008 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Sullins (1999)points out the trends of the convergence among Catholic and Protestant and the rapid decline in church attendance among Catholics, but not among Protestants.”
BackgroundUnderstanding Americans' abortion attitudes: The role of the local religious context.
Adamczyk, A., & Valdimarsdóttir, M. (2017) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.12.005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Religion and Trends in Euthanasia Attitudes among U.S. Adults, 1977–2004
Moulton, B. E., Hill, T. D., & Burdette, A. M. (2006) · doi:10.1007/s11206-006-9015-5 · Cited by 53
Unnever, J. D., Bartkowski, J., & Cullen, F. T. (2010) · doi:10.1093/socrel/srq046 · Cited by 50
Fetal Positions: Unraveling the Influence of Religion on Premarital Pregnancy Resolution
Adamczyk, A., & Felson, J. (2008) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00519.x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Trends in Abortion Attitudes by Race and Gender: A Reassessment Over a Four Decade Period
Carter, J. S., Carter, S., & Dodge, J. (2009) · Journal of Sociological Research · doi:10.5296/jsr.v1i1.156 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Previous research suggests age (Lynxwiler & Gay, 1994; Sullins, 1999), education (Kaplan et al., 2001; Wang, 2004), income, marital status (Hertel & Russell, 1999) and region of residency (Gay & Lynxwiler, 1999; Secret, 1987; Wilcox, 1992) may impact abortion attitudes.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHodge, D. (2005) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/0261547052000324982 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Hunter’s (1991, 1994) epistemological theory has been influential, both in social work (Fellin, 2000; Hutchison, 1999; Parr, 1996; Ressler & Hodge, 2000; Van Soest, 1996) and other disciplines (Carroll & Marler, 1995; Hoffmann & Miller, 1998; Jensen, 1998; Sullins, 1999; Williams, 1997).”
Cross-Cultural Attitudes Toward Abortion
Bahr, S. J., & Marcos, A. C. (2003) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x02250892 · Cited by 35
“Abortion Culture” in Russia: Its Origins, Scope, and Challenge to Social Development
Karpov, V., & Kääriäinen, K. (2005) · doi:10.1177/19367244052200202 · Cited by 25
Sigillo, A. E., Miller, M. K., & Weiser, D. A. (2012) · doi:10.1037/a0027940 · Cited by 23
Castle, J. J. (2018) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x18818169 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“…an important predictor of public opinion on a variety of cultural issues, including abortion (Cook, Jelen, & Wilcox, 1992; Evans, 2002; Jelen, 2009; Sullins, 1999) and same-sex marriage (e.g., Jelen, 2009; Olson, Cadge, & Harrison, 2006; Sherkat, de Vries, & Creek, 2010; Sherkat, Powell-Williams,…”
BackgroundContinuity and Change in Attitudes Toward Abortion: Poland and the United States
Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (2005) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x05050099 · Cited by 21
“For example, the dynamics of public opinion in the United States have changed as some groups of Roman Catholics have become more prochoice and evangelical Protestants have moved in a more pro-life direction (Sullins 1999).”
BackgroundDifferences in Worldviews between Social Workers and People of Faith
Hodge, D. (2003) · Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services · doi:10.1606/1044-3894.97 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Indeed, the perceived explanatory power of Hunter’s framework is evidenced by the considerable amount of research and discussion it has inspired (Carroll & Marler, 1995; Hoffmann & Miller, 1998; Jensen, 1998; Sullins, 1999; Williams, 1997).”
BackgroundOpinions About Abortion Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ohio
Smith, M. H., Turner, A., Chakraborty, P., Hood, R. B., Bessett, D., Gallo, M., & Norris, A. (2021) · Sexuality Research & Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-021-00638-y · Cited by 12
“…of the Protestant term, alongside a non-significant Catholic term, may be reflective of larger trends in religion’s role in politics, including the increased role that white Evangelical churches have played in the abortion debate (Hoffmann & Johnson, 2005; Siegel & Greenhouse, 2011; Sullins, 1999).”
BackgroundInstitutional Selection for Conformity: The Case of U.S. Catholic Priests
Sullins, D. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2511097 · Cited by 12
Self-citationSafe, Legal, Rare … and Early: Gender and the Politics of Abortion
Zigerell, L. J., & Barker, D. (2011) · doi:10.1080/17457289.2010.537341 · Cited by 11
“Models presented below therefore include controls for African Americans (Strickler & Danigelis, 2002), Hispanic ethnicity (Bolks et al., 2000), age (Sullins, 1999), income (Granberg & Granberg, 1980), education (Cook et al., 1992), and religiosity (Benin, 1985).”
BackgroundA Comparative Analysis of the Determinants of State Reproductive Healthcare Policies
Greentree, V. W., Lombard, J., & Morris, J. C. (2011) · doi:10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2011.32.0.281-299 · Cited by 4
“…of the population that is Catholic is not seen to be significant is contrary to the bulk of the extant literature, but seems to correspond with Sullins (1999) study that reported a decline in pro-choice attitudes in younger Protestants and a clear pro-choice trend among younger Catholics with…”
ResultIs it Really Red vs. Blue? Politics, Religion, and the Culture War Within
Baumgartner, J. C., Francia, P. L., Morris, J. S., & Scavo, C. (2008) · American Review of Politics · doi:10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2008.29.0.1-18 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Die reg op lewe : research article
Vorster, J. M. (2002) · doi:10.4102/ids.v36i2.504 · Cited by 4
Huynh-Tran, H.-D., Nguyen, D., Nguyen, T.-B., Luu, K., Nguyen-Thi, N.-H., Chu-Nguyen, Y.-T., & Truong, T.-K. (2024) · Multidisciplinary Science Journal · doi:10.31893/multiscience.2024157 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“However, Sullins (1999) found that young Catholics are becoming more permissive about abortion (Sullins, 1999).”
BackgroundResultCharacterizing Controversiality of Topics Utilizing Eccentricity of Opinions
Pandey, S., & Sayama, H. (2023) · Northeast Journal of Complex Systems · doi:10.22191/nejcs/vol5/iss1/2 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“These topics have received extensive attention and research [7, 10, 12, 23, 24] .”
Holmes, K., & Garand, J. C. (2018) · PS · doi:10.1017/s1049096517002517 · Cited by 2
Abortion politics in Ireland and Iceland: in the ‘fast lane’ for liberalising attitudes?
Field, L., & Ómarsdóttir, S. B. (2025) · Irish Political Studies · doi:10.1080/07907184.2024.2448055 · Cited by 1
“Sullins (1999) shows that, at least in American populations, Catholics and Pro-testants are converging in two key ways: their rates of church attendance (both declining, now to a level where no significant difference exists between them) and their support for abortion (both increasing, now with no…”
Agha, Y., & Gaynor, K. (2021) · Sexuality Research & Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-023-00932-x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“This finding suggests that religiosity is key in shaping individual attitudes towards abortion (Sullins, 1999).”
Partisanship, Religion, and Issue Polarization in the United States: A Reassessment
Castle, J. J., & Stepp, K. K. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09668-5
Jozkowski, K., Crawford, B. L., & Willis, M. (2020) · Sexuality Research & Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-020-00439-9
Examining Attitudes Towards Reproductive Rights in the Gauteng City-Region of South Africa
Mahomed, F. (2015) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1008-4
Beyond Binary: Value Conflict and Abortion Ambivalence in Post-Legalization Argentina
Reynoso, D. (2026) · Latin American Politics and Society · doi:10.1017/lap.2026.10054
Personal experience with abortion: a determining factor in Physician's attitudes towards abortion
Ingoma, R. M., Kim, S. Y., & Kamangu, E. (2025) · AJOG Global Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100478
Bakrač, V., & RADELJIĆ, B. (2024) · Czech Sociological Review · doi:10.13060/csr.2024.033
Francis, L. J., Mckenna, U., & Şahin, A. (2018) · Euthanasia, Abortion, Death Penalty and Religion - The Right to Life and its Limitations · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98773-6_6
- Authors
- Sullins, D. P.
- Corresponding author
- Sullins, D. Paul
- ORCID
- Sullins, D. Paul
- Venue
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 354
- ISSN
- 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314098749
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- abortion attitudes, Catholics, Protestants, religious convergence, religious polarization, church attendance decline, religious commitment, log-linear models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review