The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Professionalization of Native American (Indian) Women: Towards A Research Agenda
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The 'prostitute-princess syndrome' of much anthropological, historical and missionary writing is presently reinforced by the portrayal of Native women in the media.”
From American Indian Females and Stereotypes: Warriors, Leaders, Healers, Feminists; Not Drudges, Princesses, Prostitutes (2013) · cites this paper as Medicine, 1988a
In the citing paper
“Distorted images of Indian women have been perpetuated by the continuing male bias of mainstream writers.”
From American Indian Females and Stereotypes: Warriors, Leaders, Healers, Feminists; Not Drudges, Princesses, Prostitutes (2013) · cites this paper as Medicine, 1988a
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lajimodiere, D. K. (2013) · Multicultural Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15210960.2013.781391 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Medicine, B.
- Corresponding author
- Medicine, Beatrice
- Venue
- Wicazo Sa Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 31
- ISSN
- 0749-6427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4240061109
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 11 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wicazo Sa Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- Native American women, professionalization, research agenda, indigenous women, women's careers, gender and indigenous peoples
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Professionalization of Native American (Indian) Women: Towards A Research Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1409276
- The paper
- Medicine, B. (1988). Professionalization of Native American (Indian) Women: Towards A Research Agenda. Wicazo Sa Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409276
