Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping?

Olson, Richard K., Attneave, Fred·1970·The American Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The effectiveness of several configurational or textural variables in producing similarity grouping was investigated by measuring the time it took Ss to locate the disparate quadrant in a circular array. The 'figure' and 'ground' quadrants differed in (1) slope of elements, (2) linearity of elements, or (3) the way in which the same slopes were combined into angles. Differences in slope produced excellent grouping; differences in linearity were less effective; and differences in arrangement of slopes were generally quite ineffective. Grouping was also dependent on orientation of the whole array: horizontals and verticals gave better grouping than diagonals, and even arrangement of slopes gave moderately effective grouping when angles with horizontal and vertical axes of symmetry were opposed to each other. Conditions of head tilt were used to determine whether the grouping effects were dependent on retinal or gravitational orientation. For the angles, only retinal orientation seemed important; but for line segments and paired dots varying in slope, both retinal and gravitational orientation had significant effects. The results disconfirm the hypothesis that grouping occurs entirely on a projection level, independently of constancy mechanisms. It is suggested that grouping and segregation depend on identities and differences between descriptors which in turn represent relationships between the stimulus array and an internal Cartesian reference system. Similarity is one of the most important of Wertheimer's principles of perceptual grouping, but only recently, with the work of Julesz and Beck, has any appreciable curiosity been displayed about the kinds of similarity that are effective in this respect.' It should, of course, be understood that grouping always implies the complementary process of segregation. Grouped items must be at once similar to one another and different from extraneous items; in analysis-of-variance terminology, within-group variance must be Received for publication September 22, 1969. The research was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Grant 973-66) and in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense (Contract F44620-67C-0099). 1 M. Wertheimer, Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, Psychol. Forsch., 4, 1923, 301-350; B. Julesz, Texture and visual perception, Sci. Amer., 212, 1965, 38-48; J. Beck, Perceptual grouping produced by line figures, Percept. & Psychophys., 2, 1967, 491-495.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1420852

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Olson, R. K., & Attneave, F.
Venue
The American Journal of Psychology
Published
1970-03
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066714524
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1420852
The paper
Olson, R. K., & Attneave, F. (1970). What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping? The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420852

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.