The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formal Theories of Visual Perception
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 · Cited by 4,500
The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550 · Cited by 2,152
Rapid synchronization through fast threshold modulation
Somers, D., & Kopell, N. (1993) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00198772 · Cited by 414
Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements?
Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007254x · Cited by 359
From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition
Burton, A. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80050-0 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, J., Leeuwenberg, E. L. J., & Buffart, H. M.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1979-12
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 754
- ISSN
- 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996463738
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formal Theories of Visual Perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1421809
- The paper
- Beck, J., Leeuwenberg, E. L. J., & Buffart, H. M. (1979). Formal Theories of Visual Perception. The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1421809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
