The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concurrent Processing Demands and the Experience of Time-in-Passing
Abstract
Under the prospective paradigm, judged time decreased monotonically with the increased processing demands of concurrent card sorting (Experiment I) and of concurrent verbal rehearsal (Experiment II). It was nonmonotonically related to concurrent tapping rate (Experiment III), which latter, when required during verbal rehearsal, had an identical curvilinear effect on short-term recall (Experiment IV). It is concluded that the experience of time-in-passing is an inverse function of the processing demanded by a concurrent task. An attentional model is suggested and evaluated against the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PERSONALITY AND THE INVERTED‐U RELATION
CORCORAN, D. W. J. (1965) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1965.tb00964.x · Cited by 95
Cited by
Solanto, M. V., Abikoff, H., Sonuga-Barke, E., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., Wigal, T., Hechtman, L., Hinshaw, S., & Turkel, E. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1010329714819 · Cited by 639
Distributed neural systems for temporal production: A functional MRI study
Basso, G., Nichelli, P., Wharton, C. M., Peterson, M., & Grafman, J. (2003) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(02)00941-3 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., Gaes, G., & Bierman, K.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 431
- ISSN
- 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998233309
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent Processing Demands and the Experience of Time-in-Passing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1421874
- The paper
- Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., Gaes, G., & Bierman, K. (1977). Concurrent Processing Demands and the Experience of Time-in-Passing. The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1421874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
