The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic Facial Recognition: Examination of a Natural Phenomenon
Abstract
Drawing on anecdotal experiences in which former acquaintances meet and recognize each other after years of separation and physiognomic change, six studies sought to determine if dynamic facial recognition was a reliable natural phenomenon. Experiments 1 and 2 found evidence for an ability to recognize age-regressed faces of university faculty and staff. Familiarity, whether real-life or experimentally induced, enhanced recognition of constant and age-regressed pictures. Experiments 3 and 4 found evidence for an ability to recognize age-progressed faces, implying that dynamic facial recognition is a bidirectional cognitive ability found under conditions of intentional and incidental learning. Experiments 5 and 6 used picture-sorting and picture-matching tasks and found that performance was inversely related to the age span and to the amount of facial change between standard and comparison pictures. It was concluded that dynamic facial recognition is a reliable natural phenomenon that can be facilitated by familiarity. Notes on the source of the familiarity effect and the basis for dynamic recognition are provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Larger age gaps result in worse matching performance.
“larger age gaps result in worse matching performance (using three images each of four female students; Seamon, 1982)”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Seamon, 1982
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Seamon, J. G.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363
- ISSN
- 0002-9556
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review