Cited by 83School Choice and PerformanceTeacher Professional Development and MotivationLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Teacher Mobility Revisited

Murnane, Richard J.·1981·The Journal of Human Resources

Abstract

The mobility patterns of teachers in one large urban school district are examined for the period from 1965 to 1974, using logit analysis. We find that teacher seniority and changes in student enrollments are much more important in explaining transfers and terminations in the 1970s than in the 1960s. The reason for this is that pattern of mobility no longer reflect primarily teacher preferences. Increasingly, they reflect the pattern of declining enrollments and the operation of rules that govern the disposition of surplus teachers. This change has affected the careers of teachers, the learning of children, and the fiscal stability of school districts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/145216

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murnane, R. J.
Corresponding author
Murnane, Richard J.
Venue
The Journal of Human Resources
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1981
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
3
ISSN
0022-166X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1565590505
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Human Resources (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
teacher mobility, teacher transfer, teacher seniority, teaching profession, urban school districts, teacher preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review