Geographical and Historical Comparisons of Neotropical Streams: Biotic Diversity and Detrital Processing in Highly Variable Habitats
Abstract
Although many species that live in low-order rainforest streams obtain much of their energy in the form of terrestrial leaf detritus, marked regional differences in the quantity, quality, and seasonal timing of leaf fall occur at different latitudes. There are also major seasonal, elevational, and historical differences in the frequency of floods and droughts that influence patterns of leaf input, transport, and decomposition. These differences may provide a basis for comparing stream communities in terms of biotic diversity and modes of detrital processing. At present, regional patterns of community structure are apparent in temperate-zone streams, but no distinct general patterns of biotic diversity or functional feeding groups are clearly evident in stream communities across latitude. Diversity of stream-dwelling detritivorous fishes is apparently highest in the large, geomorphologically complex Amazon basin where environmental conditions have remained highly variable throughout the Pleistocene. Diversity of other neotropical fish communities is regionally influenced by proximity to marine coastal habitats. Some insect and decapod crustacean taxa show higher species richness in mainland montane streams; high levels of endemism characterize some insular streams. As field experimentation increases, the underlying bases for evolution of specific adaptations by benthic invertebrates in highly seasonal neotropical streams can be interpreted more reliably, and detritivory can be…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fish faunas in neotropical streams are often dominated by benthic species.
“Fish faunas in neotropical streams are often dominated by benthic species (Covich, 1988)”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Covich, 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Detritus processing by invertebrate shredders: A neotropical-temperate comparison
Wantzen, K. M., & Wagner, R. (2006) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[216:dpbisa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams
Bojsen, B. H., & Barriga, R. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00956.x · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Covich, A. P.
- Corresponding author
- Covich, Alan P.
- Venue
- Journal of the North American Benthological Society
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 361-386
- ISSN
- 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2048537983
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the North American Benthological Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Keywords
- Neotropical streams, leaf litter, latitudinal diversity gradient, leaf fall, detritivorous fish, functional feeding groups, mountain streams, endemism, benthic invertebrates, human disturbance, Amazon basin, Decapoda, stream insects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review