The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant species richness in calcareous grasslands as affected by dispersability in space and time
Abstract
Abstract. Species richness in calcareous grassland is discussed against the background of historical dispersal processes associated with traditional land‐use management such as grazing, but also the artificial establishment by hayseed. Important vectors in the traditionally man‐made landscape were sheep and cattle or other livestock such as goats. Calcareous grasslands were not only connected to each other but also to other habitats such as villages, forests, arable fields and heathlands by these vectors which could cover large distances (e.g. transhumance shepherding), which is not the case in the current man‐made landscape. Species richness after restoration management of abandoned and afforested calcareous grasslands was predicted by using characters of dispersability in space and time. These were the persistence of the species in the vegetation and the diaspore bank after abandonment or afforestation and the dispersal capacity through wind and sheep. The results reveal that reintroduction of sheep grazing is necessary to reestablish the original species richness. The first validation of the prediction of the succession on clear‐cut sites and a comparison with data of species composition in abandoned quarries and the surroundings made it obvious that a species' own dispersal capacity in space is very low except for some well wind‐dispersed species. Therefore, it is recommended to include and to simulate dispersal processes in future management to be able to restore the original species richness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants
Young, A., Boyle, T., & Brown, T. (1996) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10045-8 · Cited by 2,113
Cited by
Potential Impact of Climate Change on Vegetation in the European Alps: A Review
Theurillat, J.-P., & Guisan, A. (2001) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1010632015572 · Cited by 853
Poschlod, P., & WallisDeVries, M. F. (2002) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00201-4 · Cited by 658
Self-citationWalker, K. J., Stevens, P. A., Stevens, D. P., Mountford, J. O., Manchester, S. J., & Pywell, R. F. (2004) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.020 · Cited by 451
Kahmen, S., Poschlod, P., & Schreiber, K.-F. (2002) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00197-5 · Cited by 317
Self-citationHeterogeneity fosters biodiversity: linking history and ecology of dry calcareous grasslands
Diacon-Bolli, J., Dalang, T., Holderegger, R., & Bürgi, M. (2012) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2012.10.004 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Poschlod, P., Kiefer, S., Tränkle, U., Fischer, S., & Bonn, S.
- Venue
- Applied Vegetation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-91
- ISSN
- 1402-2001 (ISSN-L)
- 1654-109X
- OpenAlex
- W2007907595
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant species richness in calcareous grasslands as affected by dispersability in space and time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1479087
- The paper
- Poschlod, P., Kiefer, S., Tränkle, U., Fischer, S., & Bonn, S. (1998). Plant species richness in calcareous grasslands as affected by dispersability in space and time. Applied Vegetation Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/1479087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.