The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding
Abstract
Connections between grammar and social organization are examined via one of the most pervasive practices of speaking used in talk-in-interaction: yes/no type interrogatives and the turns speakers build in response to them. This investigation is composed of two parts. The first analyzes a basic organization set in motion by yes/no type interrogatives, describing a preference for “type-conforming” responses and its consequences. The second considers how this basic organization is shaped and simplified to accomplish institutionally specific goals in survey research, medical encounters, and courtroom cross-examinations, and what such manipulations reveal about these institutions. Together these findings deepen our understanding of how language is adapted to—and for—interaction, while providing analytic resources for a broad range of sociologists, whether they are engaged in the direct observation of human behavior, developing sociological theories of language, analyzing institutions and social organizations, or interested in the practical consequences of questioning in the myriad institutions that make use of this form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Cited by
Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints
STIVERS, T., & HAYASHI, M. (2010) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404509990637 · Cited by 414
Responses to Wh -Questions in English Conversation
Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2010) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351811003751680 · Cited by 244
Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466610x500791 · Cited by 181
Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2017) · doi:10.1017/9781139025928 · Cited by 90
Turiel, E., & Dahl, A. (2019) · The Normative Animal? · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190846466.003.0010 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Raymond, G.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 939-967
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2024371461
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 127.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312240306800607
- The paper
- Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240306800607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.