Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyCultural and Mythological StudiesHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Der Gott auf der Blume: Eine Agyptische Kosmogonie und Ihre Weltweite Bildwirkung

Morenz, Siegfried, Schubert, Johannes·1954·Artibus Asiae. Supplementum

Abstract

Siegfried Morenz, Johannes Schubert, Der Gott auf der Blume: Eine Ägyptische Kosmogonie und Ihre Weltweite Bildwirkung, Artibus Asiae. Supplementum, Vol. 12, Der Gott auf der Blume: Eine Ägyptische Kosmogonie und Ihre Weltweite Bildwirkung (1954), pp. 5-11+13-159+I-VIII

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1522574

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Morenz, S., & Schubert, J.
Venue
Artibus Asiae. Supplementum
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1954
Volume
12
Pages
5
ISSN
1423-0526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W641361535
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Artibus Asiae Supplementum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
Egyptian cosmogony, Atum, ancient Egyptian religion, Egyptian mythology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.