Cited by 81Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyEurasian Exchange Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Literary Evidence for Early Buddhist Art in China

Coburn, Soper Alexander·1959·Artibus Asiae. Supplementum

Abstract

Soper Alexander Coburn, Literary Evidence for Early Buddhist Art in China, Artibus Asiae. Supplementum, Vol. 19, Literary Evidence for Early Buddhist Art in China (1959), pp. iii-v+vii+ix+xi-xvi+1-121+123-139+141-257+259-273+275-296

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1522597

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coburn, S. A.
Venue
Artibus Asiae. Supplementum
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1959
Volume
19
Pages
iii
ISSN
1423-0526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068082591
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 26
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Artibus Asiae Supplementum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
Keywords
early Buddhist art, Chinese Buddhist art, Buddhist scriptures, Buddhist iconography, Buddhist art history, Chinese Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review