Les naissances sont retardees mais la fecondite est stable
Open accessAbstract
The number of births in France has been roughly constant since 1976, the year of stabilization at the end of the baby boom. After declining in the early 1990s, it has been increasing since 1995 despite the fall in the number of people of an age to be parents : the first baby boomers now approaching retirement age will have had an average of 2.1 children per woman, but will be replaced by smaller cohorts after 1973 due to the delayed age at childbearing. This delay accounts for the total period fertility rate being stable since 1976 at a lower level, of around 1.8 children per woman; a model in which the fertility of women who are already mothers varies with the age of the last child, and not with the age of the mother, produces an estimate of over 2.0 children per woman, close to the completed cohort fertility. The latter will decline slightly for the post 1956 birth cohorts, and is projected to stabilize at around 2.0 children per woman for the 1970 cohort, due to a slight increase in women who will remain childless. Notwithstanding this increase in childlessness, the distribution of women by number of children has been remarkably stable for twenty-five years : family sizes are very homogeneous since nearly two in five women have exactly two children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In France, later childbearing in the 1980 birth cohorts (average around age 30 years) would only marginally affect their completed fertility.
“In France, Toulemon and Mazuy (2001) also projected that later childbearing in the 1980 birth cohorts (average around age 30 years) would only marginally affect their completed fertility.”
From Delayed Fertility as a Driver of Fertility Decline? (2023) · cites this paper as Toulemon and Mazuy (2001)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Toulemon, L., & Mazuy, M.
- ORCID
- Toulemon, Laurent
- Venue
- Population (French Edition)
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 611
- ISSN
- 0032-4663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007550880
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- green
- www.persee.fr
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Population (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- Persée (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Keywords
- fertility stabilization, baby boom, age at childbearing, childlessness, family size distribution, fertility projections, France
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review