Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE RESPIRATORY FUNCTION OF THE BLOOD OF MARINE FISHES

Open access
ROOT, R. W.·1931·The Biological Bulletin

Abstract

1. The oxygen capacities of marine fish bloods are quite different for different species. The greatest difference is between the typically sluggish and active forms, the former having bloods of low, and the latter bloods of high oxygen capacity. There is a general correlation between oxygen capacity and corpuscle count, corpuscle volume, and iron content. 2. Studies on the oxygen dissociation curves of marine fish hemoglobin, and on the effect of carbon dioxide on the oxygen capacity have brought forth the suggestion that the effect of carbon dioxide on the hemoglobins of these fishes is not solely on their oxygen dissociation constants, but that there is an inactivation of certain of the prosthetic groups concerned in binding oxygen in the hemoglobin molecule, causing a marked decrease in oxygen-combining power of the bloods. The most marked evidence of inactivation occurs at definite ranges of carbon dioxide tension and pH for the different bloods. 3. The carbon dioxide-combining power of fish bloods appears to be correlated with hemoglobin concentration. Mackerel blood with high hemoglobin absorbs more carbon dioxide than toadfish blood, which has a low hemoglobin concentration. 4. Reduced fish blood will absorb slightly more carbon dioxide than oxygenated blood. For sea robin and toadfish bloods the range of carbon dioxide tension where this can be demonstrated is short, being between about 2 and 25 mm., while it is longer for mackerel blood, being about 2 to 95 mm. 5. There is a differential buffering ability shown by these bloods, mackerel blood being buffered the best and toadfish the poorest. 6. Comparative studies of vertebrate bloods strengthen the idea of specificity of hemoglobins. Those of the marine fishes are far more sensitive to carbon dioxide than those of the carp, turtle, and human. 7. Comparative studies on carbon dioxide transportation show that turtle and frog bloods have a relatively great, fishes a relatively small, and human blood a more or less intermediate carbon dioxide-combining power. The bloods also vary considerably in their buffering capacity, human blood having the greatest and toadfish blood the least. 8. The general results of this investigation point to an adjustment on the part of the blood of marine fishes to a sea-water environment, and the habits or characteristics of the fishes. At the same time the comparative studies indicate marked differences between the bloods of fishes and terrestrial vertebrates. These differences can perhaps be accounted for on the basis of the new morphological and physiological features that terrestrial vertebrates have acquired, along with change in environment, which have made necessary correlative changes in the respiratory function of the blood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1536959

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
ROOT, R. W.
Venue
The Biological Bulletin
Published
1931-12
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
427-456
ISSN
  • 0006-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8697
OpenAlex
W2340372800
Cited by
382
References
5
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE RESPIRATORY FUNCTION OF THE BLOOD OF MARINE FISHES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1536959
The paper
ROOT, R. W. (1931). THE RESPIRATORY FUNCTION OF THE BLOOD OF MARINE FISHES. The Biological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.2307/1536959

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.