The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes
Open accessAbstract
Chemical signals mediate many of life's processes. For organisms that use these signals to orient and navigate in their environment, where and when these cues are encountered is crucial in determining behavioral responses. In air and water, fluid mechanics impinge directly upon the distribution of odorous molecules in time and space. Animals frequently employ behavioral mechanisms that allow them to take advantage of both chemical and fluid dynamic information in order to move toward the source. In turbulent plumes, where odor is patchily distributed, animals are exposed to a highly intermittent signal. The most detailed studies that have attempted to measure fluid dynamic conditions, odor plume structure, and resultant orientation behavior have involved moths, crabs, and lobsters. The behavioral mechanisms employed by these organisms are different but generally integrate some form of chemically modulated orientation (chemotaxis) with a visual or mechanical assessment of flow conditions in order to steer up-current or upwind (rheo- or anemo-taxis, respectively). Across-stream turns are another conspicuous feature of odor-modulated tracks of a variety of organisms in different fluid conditions. In some cases, turning is initiated by detection of the lateral edges of a well-defined plume (crabs), whereas in other animals turning appears to be steered according to an internally generated program modulated by odor contacts (moth counterturning). Other organisms such as birds and fish may use similar mechanisms, but the experimental data for these organisms is not yet as convincing. The behavioral strategies employed by a variety of animals result in orientation responses that are appropriate for the dispersed, intermittent plumes dictated by the fluid-mechanical conditions in the environments that these different macroscopic organisms inhabit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Burge, T. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581405.001.0001 · Cited by 1,075
An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction
Stevenson, R. J. (2010) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp083 · Cited by 689
Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor
Cardé, R. T., & Willis, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9484-5 · Cited by 483
EARLY EVENTS IN OLFACTORY PROCESSING
Wilson, R. I., & Mainen, Z. F. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112950 · Cited by 395
Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naı̈ve hawkmoths, Manduca sexta
Raguso, R. A., & Willis, M. A. (2002) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.4010 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Vickers, N.
- Venue
- The Biological Bulletin
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-212
- ISSN
- 0006-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8697
- OpenAlex
- W2126376762
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1542524
- The paper
- Vickers, N. (2000). Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. The Biological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.