Cited by 3Art, Technology, and CultureVarious Chemistry Research TopicsScience Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

The Use of Artistic Analogies in Chemical Research and Education

Hargittai, Istvan, Hargittai, Magdolna·1994·Leonardo

Abstract

, Magdolna Hargittai, The Use of Artistic Analogies in Chemical Research and Education, Leonardo, Vol. 27, No. 3, Art and Science Similarities, Differences and Interactions: Special Issue (1994), pp. 223-226

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1576056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 3

Metadata

Authors
Hargittai, I., & Hargittai, M.
Venue
Leonardo
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
223
ISSN
0024-094X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4237528338
Cited by
3
References
0
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Leonardo (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Education › Various Chemistry Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
chemistry research, chemistry education, art and science, analogical reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Artistic Analogies in Chemical Research and Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1576056
The paper
Hargittai, I., & Hargittai, M. (1994). The Use of Artistic Analogies in Chemical Research and Education. Leonardo. https://doi.org/10.2307/1576056