Cited by 96Islamic Thought and Society StudiesQur’anic Interpretation StudiesEducation and Islamic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Authenticity of Prophetic Hadith: A Pseudo-Problem

Hallaq, Wael B.·1999·Studia Islamica

Abstract

L'A. a pour objectif de demontrer que l'etude des erudits occidentaux concernant l'authenticite des «hadith» prophetiques n'a pratiquement plus de raison d'etre. Pour ce faire, il laisse simplement la position traditionnelle parler d'elle-meme. Puis il conclut que les erudits musulmans traditionnels ont resolu le probleme pour nous et qu'il est inutile de poursuivre une quete nee de la non-ecoute de ce que disent ces savants depuis longtemps.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1596086

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Hallaq, W. B.
Corresponding author
Hallaq, Wael B.
Venue
Studia Islamica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1999
Issue
89
Pages
75
ISSN
0585-5292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073464797
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studia Islamica (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Islamic Studies
Keywords
hadith criticism, prophetic hadith, isnad and matn, hadith authenticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Authenticity of Prophetic Hadith: A Pseudo-Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1596086
The paper
Hallaq, W. B. (1999). The Authenticity of Prophetic Hadith: A Pseudo-Problem. Studia Islamica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1596086