The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Healthy Families America: Using Research to Enhance Practice
Abstract
The Healthy Families America (HFA) initiative seeks to expand the availability of high-quality, intensive home visitation services and to create communitywide commitments to these services and others that promote a supportive atmosphere for all new parents. This article briefly describes HFA's theoretical framework, its history, and its current status. The HFA Research Network, a partnership among researchers who are engaged in evaluating HFA programs around the country, is also highlighted. Preliminary findings of the research partners suggest that HFA programs may have the most success at improving parent-child interactions, with more limited or mixed success in the areas of health care status and utilization, the prevention of child abuse and neglect, and improved maternal life course outcomes. HFA programs so far have not demonstrated significant improvements in children's development or maternal social support. The authors report variability in both outcomes and attrition rates across subgroups of families in these studies, but there are no consistent patterns to identify who is most likely to stay enrolled in an HFA program or who is most likely to benefit from that enrollment. The authors conclude that these and several other areas require additional research. They further recommend that researchers and practitioners move beyond a singular focus on individualized interventions and work to create a communitywide and national context in which support for all new parents is the norm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Cited by
Love, J. M., Kisker, E. E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., Brooks-Gunn, J., Chazan-Cohen, R., Tarullo, L. B., Brady-Smith, C., et al. (2005) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.885 · Cited by 800
Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials
Olds, D. L., Sadler, L., & Kitzman, H. (2007) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01702.x · Cited by 548
Chartier, M. J., Walker, J. R., & Naimark, B. (2010) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.020 · Cited by 519
Who Drops Out of Early Head Start Home Visiting Programs?
Roggman, L. A., Cook, G. A., Peterson, C. A., & Raikes, H. H. (2008) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409280701681870 · Cited by 109
Intensive home visiting is associated with decreased risk of infant death
Donovan, E. F., Ammerman, R. T., Besl, J., Atherton, H., Khoury, J. C., Altaye, M., Putnam, F. W., & Van Ginkel, J. B. (2007) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2411 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Daro, D. A., & Harding, K. A.
- Venue
- The Future of Children
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152
- ISSN
- 1054-8289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107415493
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healthy Families America: Using Research to Enhance Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1602726
- The paper
- Daro, D. A., & Harding, K. A. (1999). Healthy Families America: Using Research to Enhance Practice. The Future of Children. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602726
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.