The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare
Abstract
Self-Fashioning is a study of sixteenth-century life and literature that spawned a new era of scholarly inquiry. Stephen Greenblatt examines the structure of selfhood as evidenced in major literary figures of the English Renaissance - More, Tyndale, Wyatt, Spenser, Marlowe, and Shakespeare - and finds that in the early modern period new questions surrounding the nature of identity heavily influenced the literature of the era. Now a classic text in literary studies, Self-Fashioning continues to be of interest to students of the Renaissance, English literature, and the new historicist tradition, and this new edition includes a preface by the author on the book's creation and influence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2013) · Cited by 619
The new historicism in literary studies
Myers, D. G. (1989) · Academic Questions · doi:10.1007/bf02682779 · Cited by 21
Thomas More and the Legal Imagination
Berry, E. (2009) · Studies in Philology · doi:10.1353/sip.0.0028 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, T. M., & Greenblatt, S.
- Venue
- Comparative Literature
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184
- ISSN
- 0010-4124 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133695197
- Cited by
- 1,639
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1770767
- The paper
- Greene, T. M., & Greenblatt, S. (1982). Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare. Comparative Literature. https://doi.org/10.2307/1770767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.