The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology
Abstract
In 1957 Ernst Kantorowicz published a book that would be the guide for generations of scholars through the arcane mysteries of medieval In Two Bodies, Kantorowicz traces the historical problem posed by the King's two bodies--the body politic and the body natural--back to the Middle Ages and demonstrates, by placing the concept in its proper setting of medieval thought and theory, how the early-modern Western monarchies gradually began to develop a political theology. The king's natural body has physical attributes, suffers, and dies, naturally, as do all humans; but the king's other body, the spiritual body, transcends the earthly and serves as a symbol of his office as majesty with the divine right to rule. The notion of the two bodies allowed for the continuity of monarchy even when the monarch died, as summed up in the formulation king is dead. Long live the king. Bringing together liturgical works, images, and polemical material, Two Bodies explores the long Christian past behind this political theology. It provides a subtle history of how commonwealths developed symbolic means for establishing their sovereignty and, with such means, began to establish early forms of the nation-state. Kantorowicz fled Nazi Germany in 1938, after refusing to sign a Nazi loyalty oath, and settled in the United States. While teaching at the University of California, Berkeley, he once again refused to sign an oath of allegiance, this one designed to identify Communist Party sympathizers. He resigned as a result of the controversy and moved to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, where he remained for the rest of his life, and where he wrote Two Bodies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CARAMANI, D. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000538 · Cited by 709
Representing Whiteness in the Black Imagination
Hooks, B. (1997) · Displacing Whiteness · doi:10.1215/9780822382270-006 · Cited by 365
Of gods, glyphs and kings: divinity and rulership among the Classic Maya
Houston, S., & Stuart, D. (1996) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00083289 · Cited by 265
1 Home Turf: Archaeology, Territoriality, and Politics
VanValkenburgh, P., & Osborne, J. F. (2012) · Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association · doi:10.1111/apaa.12000 · Cited by 13
Continuity despite and through death: regicide and royal shrines among the shilluk of southern Sudan
Schnepel, B. (1991) · Africa · doi:10.2307/1160269 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cantor, N. F., & Kantorowicz, E. H.
- Venue
- The American Historical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1958-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81
- ISSN
- 0002-8762 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062152586
- Cited by
- 1,805
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1844871
- The paper
- Cantor, N. F., & Kantorowicz, E. H. (1958). The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. The American Historical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1844871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.