Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution

Arnstein, Walter L., Corrigan, Philip, Sayer, Derek, Aylmer, G. E.·1987·The American Historical Review

Abstract

A remarkably centralized country - state formation in Medieval England This realm of England is an Empire - revolution of 1530s an elect nation - Elizabethan consolidation mortall God enthroned - one bourgeois revolution (of many) from theatre to machine - old curruption the working class question - Society and society There is, above all, an agency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1862821

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Arnstein, W. L., Corrigan, P., Sayer, D., & Aylmer, G. E.
Venue
The American Historical Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-02
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
123
ISSN
0002-8762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092310484
Cited by
734
References
0
FWCI
300.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1862821
The paper
Arnstein, W. L., Corrigan, P., Sayer, D., & Aylmer, G. E. (1987). The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. The American Historical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1862821

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.