Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 908

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sports: A Contribution to the Theory of the Firm in Sporting Competition and in Market Competition

Neale, Walter C.·1964·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

Louis-Schmelling paradox, 1. — The inverted joint product or the product joint, 2. — League standing effect, 3. — Fourth estate benefit, 3. — Multifirm plants, 5. — Diminishing quality returns, 8. — Input-enthusiasm effect, 8. — Roger Maris cobweb, 12. — Bobby Layne rigidity, 12. — Archie Moore invisibility, 13.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1880543

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 908

Metadata

Authors
Neale, W. C.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1964-02
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2263553286
Cited by
908
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sports: A Contribution to the Theory of the Firm in Sporting Competition and in Market Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1880543
The paper
Neale, W. C. (1964). The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sports: A Contribution to the Theory of the Firm in Sporting Competition and in Market Competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1880543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.