The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach
Abstract
Introduction, 545. — I. A simple model, 545. — II. Some consequences of the analysis, 549. — III. The simple model and reality, 552.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liquidity-profitability tradeoff: An empirical investigation in an emerging market
Eljelly, A. M. A. (2004) · International Journal of Commerce and Management · doi:10.1108/10569210480000179 · Cited by 906
EQUILIBRIUM IN A PURE CURRENCY ECONOMY
LUCAS, R. E. (1980) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1980.tb00570.x · Cited by 561
(1982) · Journal of Economic Literature · Cited by 411
Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash Than They Used To?
Bates, T., Kahle, K., & Stulz, R. (2006) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w12534 · Cited by 367
Liquidity: A New Monetarist Perspective
Lagos, R., Rocheteau, G., & Wright, R. (2017) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20141195 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumol, W. J.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1952-11
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 545
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123908125
- Cited by
- 2,349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1882104
- The paper
- Baumol, W. J. (1952). The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
