The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nondissipative Signaling Structures and Dividend Policy
Abstract
Existence conditions for signaling equilibria in which the signal is not exogenously costly are derived for the continuum of classes case. Applications to labor market models based on productivity quotas and time-profiles of wages, and an exploratory model of the “information content” of corporate dividends are discussed. The last application focuses on intertemporal consistency requirements and the role of insider trading observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure
Bhattacharya, S., & Ritter, J. R. (1983) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297419 · Cited by 721
Self-citationCompetition, risk neutrality and loan commitments
Boot, A., Thakor, A. V., & Udell, G. F. (1987) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/0378-4266(87)90043-4 · Cited by 170
An economic rationale for the pricing structure of bank loan commitments
Thakor, A. V., & Udell, G. F. (1987) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/0378-4266(87)90053-7 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhattacharya, S.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-08
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109991025
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
